Audit commissioner lambasts Sutton High Street project

Sutton high Street during the works Sutton high Street during the works

A Government watchdog described Sutton Council’s High Street redevelopment project as a failure.

The damning verdict, from Lindsey Mallors, the Audit Commission’s external auditor for Sutton, came at a meeting to discuss the council’s own critical internal audit of its running of the unpopular £3m project.

She stopped short of ordering an external investigation into the project, indicating she was satisfied with the quality of the council’s own audit, and the recommendations it had put forward.

She said: “This is one failure, but is that indicative of failure across all projects?”

At the meeting, at Sutton Civic Centre on Thursday, members of the audit committee accepted mistakes were made on the project that were not indicative of Sutton Council’s usual project management.

The head of the committee, Councillor Tim Crowley, said: “We must be certain a situation like this never happens again.”

The audit showed a litany of errors, oversights and mismanagement, including pushing ahead with features that were dangerous to disabled residents.

Among new failings to emerge at the meeting was council officers missing the chance to spot growing overspends on the project on 15 separate occasions.

The mistakes resulted in a £300,000 bill for Sutton taxpayers, which could have been picked up by Transport for London had it been spotted earlier.

Councillor Jayne McCoy, responsible for the project from May 2010, said: “I welcome the additional scrutiny of our external auditors because mistakes of this kind, even if they are rare, need to be rooted out.

“As a result of the public investigation I ordered, major changes will happen to the way we carry out project and financial management.”

The project remains unfinished, with a living wall of plants near Wilkinsons not installed and planting, working entry gates and tree lights still lacking.

Coun McCoy said: “The costs have already been released, so my job is now to ensure they are completed at best value to the taxpayer.”

Comments(4)

LiberalsOut says...
1:28pm Thu 5 May 11

Why are no Councillors heads rolling for this ???Councillor McCoy has been in charge of the High Street revamp for a year now and it seems all she has done is wait for some 3rd parties to give their verdict on this debacle and then thank them for their input.If this was a Private Sector project, all the legal angles would have been covered and those guilty of mis-management would have been sacked.Unfortunately this is the norm with Sutton Council - wasting money - vanity projects - mis management of OUR hard earned money.The Lib Dems have been in power here for too long and have become complacent and if you vote yes in the AV vote you will get this sort of thing on a national level

theavengers says...
2:52pm Thu 5 May 11

Get rid of those responsible. I fyou make this sort of **** up in a ordinary workplace you'd be fired. We also need to have a audit showing just how much of a debacle and ongoing waste of money the life centre is.

Exiled In Sutton says...
10:37pm Wed 11 May 11

I suggest you read the internal audit report.

You can find it here:

http://sutton.modern
gov.co.uk/mgConvert2
PDF.aspx?ID=18061

It misses the point - it talks about updating project management frameworks! You can have all the frameworks you like but if the senior management are making bad decisions/not competent then having a better framework makes no difference.

How can strategic directors allow this to happen. These are people on salaries upto around 100k - and they have allowed basic project management errors. More than that they have been complicit in ineffectual delivery - where are the consequences for them?

I wonder whether the senior managers in question got their performance bonus?

If anyone has the energy it might be worth an FOI.

I appreciate the political points being made about councillors but this just smacks of incompetent council officers.

Council officers have clearly misled members/politicians during the project in the way they have reported the status etc of the project.

I want to challenge the Audit Commission - I think a fuller audit is required and officers held to account. If this doesn't happen then there is a good chance they will just WASTE/MISMANAGE further public funds.

Suppliers/contractor
s will be queuing up to milk the Sutton cash cow at our expense.

Exiled In Sutton says...
10:49pm Wed 11 May 11

I also want to question what difference the 3m pound investment has made - what are the benefits and where are they?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree