Nonsuch school head takes 'indefinite leave' (From Sutton Guardian)
Contact us: Got a photo? Text SLPICS to 80360, click to upload your story or call
020 8722 6355
Mystery as Nonsuch High School head takes 'indefinite special leave'
11:20am Monday 16th April 2012 in News By Matt Watts
Karin Rowsell left Nonsuch High School more than two weeks ago
Mystery surrounds the headteacher of Nonsuch High School's absence from the academy on "indefinite special leave".
Karin Rowsell has been on the leave for more than two weeks, since shortly before the school Easter holidays started.
Deputy headteacher Tracey Hartley refused to comment on whether Mrs Rowsell's absence was for personal or professional reasons.
She said the school would not be making any comment at this point on the absence.
She said the school would be communicating with parents "accordingly" about what had happened.
The school's board of Governors, that oversees the running of the school, is also not commenting on Mrs Rowsell's absence.
Mrs Rowsell has been head of the school since September 2009.
The school, one of the top performing state-funded schools in the country, became an academy in September last year.
Pupils and staff returned to the school from the Easter break this morning.
Do you know more? Contact the newsdesk on 0208 722 6359 or email mwatts@london.newsquest.co.uk.
Comments(20)
Docs22
says...
7:33pm Mon 16 Apr 12
Likkle
says...
7:41pm Mon 16 Apr 12
She may have had a death in the famiy for all we know, yet someone has felt the need to put it in the local paper.
Cant people have any privacy anymore??!!
lilacgeorge
says...
6:46am Tue 17 Apr 12
Liz2076
says...
8:19am Tue 17 Apr 12
Smudger
says...
8:46am Tue 17 Apr 12
theavengers
says...
9:10am Tue 17 Apr 12
Krissi
says...
11:49am Tue 17 Apr 12
dmw-10
says...
2:10am Wed 18 Apr 12
On another note, every week I see this newspaper full of typing errors, incorrect grammar and to be blunt, total rubbish!
I can type and proofread and am currently looking for work so if the people at the Guardian HQ cannot do their jobs properly, move over and let someone who does want to work for their money have a chance!
Angela M
says...
11:35am Wed 18 Apr 12
Likkle
says...
11:36am Wed 18 Apr 12
Docs22
says...
4:34pm Wed 18 Apr 12
digital camel
says...
7:24pm Wed 18 Apr 12
Likkle wrote:As a parent of a Nonsuch pupil I do not expect to find out about the Head's sudden departure via an internet news article. Is it anyone's business? Actually, yes. The Head Teacher and Governing Body are responsible for an annual expenditure in excess of £5 million pounds of public money and the education and welfare of some 1200 children. Public scrutiny and transparency is not only inevitable but necessary. A personal loss or illness are easily explained as such, without the need to go into any invasive detail whatsoever. This leaves, presumably, "professional" reasons which can have far greater latent repercussions on teaching and learning at the School. We have a Governing Body that fails to inform parents for weeks. At what point is all this meant to give me confidence in what the Governing Body has (or rather, has not) said, let alone done? As a parent, Chair of Governors, and professional governance clerk myself, it doesn't. Does this Academy consider parental and public accountability so inconsequential?
Is it actually anyones business as to why she has disappeared?
She may have had a death in the famiy for all we know, yet someone has felt the need to put it in the local paper.
Cant people have any privacy anymore??!!
labyrinth
says...
10:48am Thu 19 Apr 12
Nonsuch takes a huge amount from the community, including depriving local girls of places so that heavily tutored ones can be driven in from all over.It treats residents with contempt.
Surreydon
says...
7:05pm Thu 19 Apr 12
Michael Pantlin wrote:Absolutely!
Sounds like the mystery of the woman CEO before last of St. Helier Hospital. No one could find out why she left so suddenly. When public money provides wages we should be told.
Giles C
says...
10:38pm Thu 19 Apr 12
Hope this hasn't happened here.
Also hearing anotherbSutton grammar school has lost its head!
Oops to lose 1 can be an accident but 2!!!
Smudger
says...
11:36pm Thu 19 Apr 12
Surreydon wrote:Yup. And I assume that you'd be happy for your own private details to be made public? After all in some way the public pays everybody's wages (and of course public sector workers pay taxes, so by your logic they pay their own wages). You'd be happy for that, yes?
Michael Pantlin wrote:Absolutely!
Sounds like the mystery of the woman CEO before last of St. Helier Hospital. No one could find out why she left so suddenly. When public money provides wages we should be told.
Giles C
says...
9:06am Fri 20 Apr 12
Smudger wrote:Smudger...yes i would if i were at the level of the St Helier CEO or a highly paid head. These are people in positions of responsibility and the pay they get reflects this so it is only right that the taxpayers are allowed to know what their renumeration is. I am not advocating this lower down the scale.
Surreydon wrote:Yup. And I assume that you'd be happy for your own private details to be made public? After all in some way the public pays everybody's wages (and of course public sector workers pay taxes, so by your logic they pay their own wages). You'd be happy for that, yes?
Michael Pantlin wrote:Absolutely!
Sounds like the mystery of the woman CEO before last of St. Helier Hospital. No one could find out why she left so suddenly. When public money provides wages we should be told.
Smudger
says...
2:50pm Fri 20 Apr 12
Surreydon
says...
9:29pm Fri 20 Apr 12
Surely asking for a reasonable explanation isn't too much to ask, is it?
Regarding the 'remuneration' issue, of course taxpayers have the right to know how much these people earn. Reckon it would shock a few folk!
Michael Pantlin says...
2:52pm Mon 16 Apr 12