Olympic organisers respond to councillors criticisms

How Sutton High Street was expected to look like How Sutton High Street was expected to look like

The organising committee of the Olympic and Paralympic games has responded to criticisms by a Cheam councillor.

Mary Burstow slammed the “boring” Olympic banners in Cheam and criticised them as a waste of money in her online blog.

Sutton Council was given £50,000 of funding by the GLA to spend on decoration ahead of the Olympic Games.

The money was to be spent on bunting, flag poles and other Olympic themed displays from Locog, the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games', official supplier Icon.

Locog responded to the criticism and said: “We have worked together with local authorities to create a London 2012 ‘look’ that connects communities across the UK to the venues and the Games.

“A wide range of ‘look’ assets are available, from banners to bunting and floral displays, which were pulled together following feedback and consultation with local authorities. If boroughs do not wish to display London 2012 Look they can use their own local decorations.”

Councillor Jill Whitehead, chair of environment and neighbourhoods committee on Sutton Council, said: "The GLA has funded all of the official Olympic decorations, and we have only been able to choose from designs sent out by LOCOG.

"LOCOG's contractors began putting up the banners at the end of last week and most town centres are now complete, although there are still some banners scheduled to go up in Sutton High Street, and every Sutton school has been given Olympic bunting to decorate their buildings. “Summer 2012 is a once in a lifetime opportunity to show our city off to the world, so it's important that our borough looks its best."

The banners went up at the end of last week and there are still some banners scheduled to go up in Sutton High Street.

What do you think? Send your opinions to ssleigh@london.newsquest.co.uk.

Comments(6)

Binsanity says...
9:58pm Sat 16 Jun 12

WHY !!!!!!!!!

Michael Pantlin says...
2:02pm Sun 17 Jun 12

Why what? I'm confused.

Sutton53 says...
3:17pm Sun 17 Jun 12

As I read this article it looks like 'Sutton Council' were given £50,000 by the GLA to spend on 'Olympic' decorations for the whole borough. Why is Mary Burstow blaming LOCOG when the article states that the Boroughs can use their own decorations if they wish? What has Sutton Council spent the £50,000 on? Surely a few lamp-post decorations do not amount to £50,000.

Michael Pantlin says...
6:23pm Sun 17 Jun 12

Cllr Burstow and Mr. Care Minister Burstow please forget this distraction and concentrate on something that matters like saving the departments at St. Helier Hospital that are facing the axe of your Coalition.

Giles C says...
6:41am Mon 18 Jun 12

This is so typical Sutton council.
They take a decision and then make out it's someone else's fault.
Fantastic

Michael Pantlin says...
10:40am Mon 18 Jun 12

Giles C wrote:
This is so typical Sutton council.
They take a decision and then make out it's someone else's fault.
Fantastic
LBS email address should be
notmyfaultguv.gov.uk

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree