Sutton Life Centre still relies on Government top-ups

The Sutton Life Centre The Sutton Life Centre

A Government grant given for start-up costs for the Sutton Life Centre is continuing to bail it out from overspends, three years after it was granted.

In 2009 the council was awarded external funding of £256,000 Local Authority Business Growth Inventive (Lagbi).

The former minister for local government, Phil Woolas, told Parliament in 2007 that the Lagbi scheme "aims to encourage local authorities to increase business growth in their areas" and would be made from business rates revenue in their area.

The executive agreed in 2009 that £181,000 of the grant would cover start up costs for the Life Centre this included £160,000 "one-off" set-up costs and £21,000 to provide discounts of up to 50 per cent for Sutton’s schools during the Life Centre’s first year of operation.

However, figures for the centre for 2012/13 reveal a difference of £60,800 between the council's budget and projected costs of £529,000.

Thie council has said this has been filled by money from the original Lagbi funding.

Deputy leader of the opposition, Tim Crowley, said: "They have gone in to their safety valve to top it up again. The money should have been spent on local businesses.

"We are three years into the life centre and it could be construed as a slush fund - used to prop it up when they go over budget. That is not start-up costs."

Figures from February this year showed the Life Centre has overspent by £261,200 that financial year.

In relation to the projected costs for the life centre this year Coun Crowley added: "The original business case said it would make a profit - now we are subsidising it.

"I was astounded that the subsidy is over half a million pounds and at a time when the council is saying it has got no money.

"I’m annoyed that it looks like a continual waste of tax payer’s money."

Sutton Councillor Graham Tope, chairman of the centre's management board said: “The Life Centre is a multipurpose community building that provides thousands of local children with a number of unique and exciting services.

"The centre includes sports facilities, a youth club, and climbing wall as well as the community library so its operation requires greater resources than that of other libraries.

“The Lagbi funding received in 2009 was earmarked for starting up the Life Centre and has been rolled out to cover the different stages of the start-up since then.

"Starting a unique and engaging project like this is a long process, so the money has been used to help support different stages of that start-up.

"This process was drawn up when the LAGBI funding was granted and we have remained within budget to provide a cost effective service to our local community, all in one place, that’s not provided anywhere else in London.”


 

 

Comments(13)

Margaret_Hale says...
11:23am Sat 20 Oct 12

Anyone who saw the original business plan could have predicted this, and Coun Crowley certainly did that.

However, I am surprised that he is only "annoyed" with the appalling waste of council taxpayers' money by the LibDems and Coun Tope. In my opinion he should be incandescant with rage!

Every single voter should bear in mind this dreadful experiment with our money at the next local election. Vote the spendthrift LibDem council out.

Michael Pantlin says...
2:09pm Sat 20 Oct 12

As this white elephant has proved itself to be such an effective funding magnet I suggest St. Helier Hospital departments being shut down should be relocated in the Life Centre.

ResidentTony says...
1:09pm Mon 22 Oct 12

I think this facility is actually a very good thing. I note that an earlier comment dismisses it as a white elephant without giving any evidence as to why it is one; the fact that it is struggling with funding certainly does not make it one. Conversely, a facility could in theory be awash with profits and be of no value to the community whatever!

PS the LAGBI pot of money would seem to be CENTRAL govt money, if I am reading the article correctly and therefore no direct drain whatever on local people. This is as it should be, given that the Centre serves areas well beyond the borough, thanks to its currently unique nature.

PPS Having said all that, I am sympathatic with the earlier comment about the need to keep the A&E going - I just don't think it helps to link the two, as the funding streams come from completely different sources, and as both facilities should continue. But, as a a "cri de coeur", it is understandble.

Michael Pantlin says...
2:33pm Mon 22 Oct 12

ResidentTony wrote:
I think this facility is actually a very good thing. I note that an earlier comment dismisses it as a white elephant without giving any evidence as to why it is one; the fact that it is struggling with funding certainly does not make it one. Conversely, a facility could in theory be awash with profits and be of no value to the community whatever!

PS the LAGBI pot of money would seem to be CENTRAL govt money, if I am reading the article correctly and therefore no direct drain whatever on local people. This is as it should be, given that the Centre serves areas well beyond the borough, thanks to its currently unique nature.

PPS Having said all that, I am sympathatic with the earlier comment about the need to keep the A&E going - I just don't think it helps to link the two, as the funding streams come from completely different sources, and as both facilities should continue. But, as a a "cri de coeur", it is understandble.
What's more important of the two Tony if there was sufficient funding only for one of them and you were in charge and had to choose,the Life Centre or the A&E?

ResidentTony says...
3:00pm Mon 22 Oct 12

Obviously health issues have to trump everything and I would in the theoretical scenario described prioritise the A & E etc over anything else. However, in the real world, closing the one down won't help reopen the other. What's more, if the Life Centre does its job and reduces anti-social behaviour at source there may be fewer visits to the A & E. All that said, the A & E should of course stay open and with any luck it will.

Giles C says...
3:18pm Mon 22 Oct 12

Resident Tony what you seem to be saying is that if its central govt money it shouldnt matter....Isnt it all tax take?
Moreover when the life centre was first mooted it was going to be a self financing and sustaining project..now its costing the taxpayers of Sutton over 500k a year.This at a time when carers are having services cut back..voluntary groups are getting funding slashed and the councils customer services are being stripped bare..and for what..a councils vanity and stubborness. Just remember the Life centre when they make cuts to any other services.

ResidentTony says...
3:39pm Mon 22 Oct 12

The £500k isn't funded by Sutton taxpayers, if I am reading the article correctly.

Also, without wishing to be too much of an apologist for local councillors, I would like to think that people generally take on this role NOT out of vanity, but rather to help improve their neighbourhoods. The Sutton Life Centre helps improve the Sutton neighbourhood - as well as others neighbourhoods whose citizens use the facility.

PS

Michael Pantlin says...
12:38pm Wed 24 Oct 12

Correct me if I'm wrong but don't I recall there was a financial disaster with the Charles Cryer development? Wasn't it intended to be just a refurbishment of the pre existing hall but they just went on knocking more and more bits down until there was only a tiny bit of one wall left? Wasn't it reported at the time that the debt incurred would be with us for many years because of the interest payable on borrowed money?

ResidentTony says...
12:55pm Wed 24 Oct 12

At the end of the day, Carshalton has a theatre, and that has to be is a good thing in my book. It's one of best things about the village (after the beautiful pond, park and church).

sfocata says...
9:43am Thu 25 Oct 12

If stuff is funded from taxes... so what? That's what the taxes are for... libraries, schools, health (and in my opinion, public transport should be properly subsidised in that way).

Whether or not the money is effectively used to create something worthwhile is another matter, dependent on management, but the basic issue of government funding should not be a scandal.

Margaret_Hale says...
12:06pm Fri 26 Oct 12

People seem to think that funding something from tax is free money. I have just posted my 2011-12 tax return and it makes me as angry as paying my council tax.
Of course, I have no objection to my taxes going to pay for essential public services but why should I subsidise (either from local or national tax) what was always going to be a failure?

ResidentTony says...
12:58pm Fri 26 Oct 12

Struggling with finances does not make a public service such as a library or the Sutton Life Centre a failure. These are not essentially profit making business ventures; a drive in burger joint for instance might make bucket loads of profit, but would you want one on your doorstep – I know I definitely would not! The Life Centre is a facility to improve the life chances of young people in Sutton and elsewhere. Incidentally, the Centre also has a good library as part of what it provides. It’s only seen as a "failure" by those who believe in a "Small Government" regime, which does little for its citizens beyond the most limited range of "essential" services. On this basis all the libraries in the country would close down overnight as would many theatres, parks, museums, etc. Perhaps we could have private parks, which you have to pay to go into!!?? I hope people reading this will see that this would be daft and that a good range of local services and provisions beyond the bare essential is worth having. This has always been accepted and thankfully still is by most people when they actually think about it. Of course, there will always be a certain group of people who say “What do I want xx service for – I never it”. Extreme examples of such people might even close schools down if they have no children and cut NHS hospital services to the bone if they have private health insurance. So let me repeat: needing funding does not a failure make.

sfocata says...
12:17pm Sat 27 Oct 12

"... always going to be a failure"? If you could let me have next week's Premiership results as soon as possible, Margaret, I'd be most grateful!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree