Sutton Life Centre still relies on Government top-ups (From Sutton Guardian)
Contact us: Got a photo? Text SLPICS to 80360, click to upload your story or call
020 8722 6355
Sutton Life Centre still relies on Government top-ups
10:10am Saturday 20th October 2012 in News By Sophia Sleigh, Reporter
A Government grant given for start-up costs for the Sutton Life Centre is continuing to bail it out from overspends, three years after it was granted.
In 2009 the council was awarded external funding of £256,000 Local Authority Business Growth Inventive (Lagbi).
The former minister for local government, Phil Woolas, told Parliament in 2007 that the Lagbi scheme "aims to encourage local authorities to increase business growth in their areas" and would be made from business rates revenue in their area.
The executive agreed in 2009 that £181,000 of the grant would cover start up costs for the Life Centre this included £160,000 "one-off" set-up costs and £21,000 to provide discounts of up to 50 per cent for Sutton’s schools during the Life Centre’s first year of operation.
However, figures for the centre for 2012/13 reveal a difference of £60,800 between the council's budget and projected costs of £529,000.
Thie council has said this has been filled by money from the original Lagbi funding.
Deputy leader of the opposition, Tim Crowley, said: "They have gone in to their safety valve to top it up again. The money should have been spent on local businesses.
"We are three years into the life centre and it could be construed as a slush fund - used to prop it up when they go over budget. That is not start-up costs."
Figures from February this year showed the Life Centre has overspent by £261,200 that financial year.
In relation to the projected costs for the life centre this year Coun Crowley added: "The original business case said it would make a profit - now we are subsidising it.
"I was astounded that the subsidy is over half a million pounds and at a time when the council is saying it has got no money.
"I’m annoyed that it looks like a continual waste of tax payer’s money."
Sutton Councillor Graham Tope, chairman of the centre's management board said: “The Life Centre is a multipurpose community building that provides thousands of local children with a number of unique and exciting services.
"The centre includes sports facilities, a youth club, and climbing wall as well as the community library so its operation requires greater resources than that of other libraries.
“The Lagbi funding received in 2009 was earmarked for starting up the Life Centre and has been rolled out to cover the different stages of the start-up since then.
"Starting a unique and engaging project like this is a long process, so the money has been used to help support different stages of that start-up.
"This process was drawn up when the LAGBI funding was granted and we have remained within budget to provide a cost effective service to our local community, all in one place, that’s not provided anywhere else in London.”
Comments(13)
Michael Pantlin
says...
2:09pm Sat 20 Oct 12
ResidentTony
says...
1:09pm Mon 22 Oct 12
PS the LAGBI pot of money would seem to be CENTRAL govt money, if I am reading the article correctly and therefore no direct drain whatever on local people. This is as it should be, given that the Centre serves areas well beyond the borough, thanks to its currently unique nature.
PPS Having said all that, I am sympathatic with the earlier comment about the need to keep the A&E going - I just don't think it helps to link the two, as the funding streams come from completely different sources, and as both facilities should continue. But, as a a "cri de coeur", it is understandble.
Michael Pantlin
says...
2:33pm Mon 22 Oct 12
ResidentTony wrote:What's more important of the two Tony if there was sufficient funding only for one of them and you were in charge and had to choose,the Life Centre or the A&E?
I think this facility is actually a very good thing. I note that an earlier comment dismisses it as a white elephant without giving any evidence as to why it is one; the fact that it is struggling with funding certainly does not make it one. Conversely, a facility could in theory be awash with profits and be of no value to the community whatever!
PS the LAGBI pot of money would seem to be CENTRAL govt money, if I am reading the article correctly and therefore no direct drain whatever on local people. This is as it should be, given that the Centre serves areas well beyond the borough, thanks to its currently unique nature.
PPS Having said all that, I am sympathatic with the earlier comment about the need to keep the A&E going - I just don't think it helps to link the two, as the funding streams come from completely different sources, and as both facilities should continue. But, as a a "cri de coeur", it is understandble.
ResidentTony
says...
3:00pm Mon 22 Oct 12
Giles C
says...
3:18pm Mon 22 Oct 12
Moreover when the life centre was first mooted it was going to be a self financing and sustaining project..now its costing the taxpayers of Sutton over 500k a year.This at a time when carers are having services cut back..voluntary groups are getting funding slashed and the councils customer services are being stripped bare..and for what..a councils vanity and stubborness. Just remember the Life centre when they make cuts to any other services.
ResidentTony
says...
3:39pm Mon 22 Oct 12
Also, without wishing to be too much of an apologist for local councillors, I would like to think that people generally take on this role NOT out of vanity, but rather to help improve their neighbourhoods. The Sutton Life Centre helps improve the Sutton neighbourhood - as well as others neighbourhoods whose citizens use the facility.
PS
Michael Pantlin
says...
12:38pm Wed 24 Oct 12
ResidentTony
says...
12:55pm Wed 24 Oct 12
sfocata
says...
9:43am Thu 25 Oct 12
Whether or not the money is effectively used to create something worthwhile is another matter, dependent on management, but the basic issue of government funding should not be a scandal.
Margaret_Hale
says...
12:06pm Fri 26 Oct 12
Of course, I have no objection to my taxes going to pay for essential public services but why should I subsidise (either from local or national tax) what was always going to be a failure?
ResidentTony
says...
12:58pm Fri 26 Oct 12
sfocata
says...
12:17pm Sat 27 Oct 12
Margaret_Hale says...
11:23am Sat 20 Oct 12
However, I am surprised that he is only "annoyed" with the appalling waste of council taxpayers' money by the LibDems and Coun Tope. In my opinion he should be incandescant with rage!
Every single voter should bear in mind this dreadful experiment with our money at the next local election. Vote the spendthrift LibDem council out.