NHS claims are a "sick joke" says council leader (From Sutton Guardian)
Contact us: Got a photo? Text SLPICS to 80360, click to upload your story or call
020 8722 6355
NHS claims are a "sick joke" says Sutton Council leader
7:20am Monday 11th June 2012 in Save St Helier By Sophia Sleigh, Reporter
Claims made by NHS chiefs about the future of St Helier hospital have been branded a “sick joke” by the leader of Sutton Council.
In a report into the future of NHS services in south London, NHS chiefs claim that visits to St Helier could be reduced by up to 40 per cent.
The report was one of the documents studied by the Better Services Better Value (BSBV) panel, which last month recommended that St Helier’s accident and emergency, maternity and children’s wards should be closed.
However, Sutton Council leader, Ruth Dombey, said: “The idea that the number of people using A&E can be cut by 40 per cent at a stroke is a sick joke.
“The number of people visiting St Helier A&E is increasing because the population is increasing. If they think that can be reduced they are living in a fantasy world.
“The fact that some people have no further treatment is irrelevant. Patients need the reassurance that only a real emergency department can provide.”
The Urgent and Emergency Care Clinical Working Group Final Clinical Report suggests that up to 40 per cent of patients who visited A&E could be treated outside hospitals in GP’s surgeries, patient’s own homes and other community settings.
However, 2010-11 alone St Helier Hospital treated 81,739 emergency cases, three per cent up on the previous year.
Councillor Dombey added: “All of the community services are useful, but how can we possibly believe that they can take the place of A&E or have the capacity to see more people than they do already?
“The BSBV review is recommending cuts to local hospital services without considering the fact that the money available for community services is also shrinking every year. How can social care services possibly pick up the tab?
“It’s very telling indeed that the National Clinical Advisory Team, which advises on the potential effectiveness of healthcare plans, has maintained a deafening silence since BSBV recommended this plan.
“Sutton’s residents have a right to know that their health is being properly looked after and this botched plan certainly doesn’t do that.”
Councillors have called a special meeting on June 11 to grill health service officials on the proposals.
The BSBV plan will be subject to public consultation once the BSBV programme board has approved the closures.
Comments(7)
Michael Pantlin
says...
2:27pm Mon 11 Jun 12
uk is the email address given by the Scrutiny Committee which invites readers' reactions to the cuts proposals for their meeting with NHS chiefs this week.
Michael Pantlin
says...
2:52pm Mon 11 Jun 12
Danny Bhoy
says...
10:31pm Mon 11 Jun 12
Giles C
says...
8:33am Tue 12 Jun 12
westsutton
says...
3:01pm Tue 12 Jun 12
Michael Pantlin
says...
10:37am Sat 16 Jun 12
westsutton wrote:Nice one, well said westsutton.
Yes, here in the one party state of Sutton, where the ConDems rule supreme, we are expected to swallow the garbage that the Liberal MP Health Minister, his Liberal wife Cllr/Health Ctte Chair and their supporting Liberal council hacks have no say in their own Government which is dictating the cuts and health reforms driving the destruction of St Helier. The Sutton Guardian might fall for that rubbbish but I doubt that local people will. Paul Burstow supports St Helier like the rope supports the hanging man.
gbzgc says...
1:13pm Mon 11 Jun 12
Councillor Dombey why don't you just speak to your colleague Mr Photo opportunity (Burstow) or even better your fellow councillor Mrs Photo opportunity (Burstow) about this rather than making token PR gestures in this paper. It is amazing how many good news stories and PR stories have suddenly appeared in the press with one of the Burstow clan or Tom Brake smiling away merrily. They must all think we were born yesterday!!!